Research - (2022) Volume 13, Issue 1

Development and Validation of Analytical Method for Quantification of Emtricitabine, Tenofovir and Efavirenz in Drug Substances and in Tablet Dosage Form by High Performance Liquid Chromatography
R Nageswara Rao*, D. Madhuri, M Vidhya Swetha and E Sree Harsha
 
Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Creative Educational Society’s College of Pharmacy, NH-7, Chinnetekur, Kurnool-518218, Andhra Pradesh, India
 
*Correspondence: R Nageswara Rao, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Creative Educational Society’s College of Pharmacy, NH-7, Chinnetekur, Kurnool-518218, Andhra Pradesh, India, Tel: 9966338326, Email:

Received: Feb 01, 2022, Manuscript No. PHMETHODS-22-53078; Editor assigned: Feb 04, 2022, Pre QC No. PHMETHODS-22-53078 (PQ); Reviewed: Feb 18, 2022, QC No. PHMETHODS-22-53078; Revised: Feb 25, 2022, Manuscript No. PHMETHODS-22-53078 (R); Published: Mar 04, 2022, DOI: 10.35248/2229-4708.22.13.226

Abstract

A simple, rapid, accurate, robust and reproducible RP HPLC method has been developed and validated for the analysis of FTC, TFV and EFV in drug substances. The chromatographic quantification was carried out using Inertial ODS-3V column C18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) with MP composition of ACN: 1%IPA in 80:20%v/v at flow rate 1 mL/min and temperature of 30°C. UV Spectrophotometric detection was employed at 256 nm, the Rt was found to be 2.4, 2.8 and 5.2 min. The detector response was linear in the range of 5-25, 7.5-37.5 and 15-45 μg/ml respectively. The LOD and LOQ of were found to be 0.065 tom 0.198 μg/ml respectively. The precision values, expressed as % RSD values were 0.30, 0.52 and 0.23. The tablet % assay of FTC,TFV AND EVF was found 101.83, 98.26 and 100.17%. The accuracy was in the range of 100.4 to 100.6%. The method was successfully employed for the quantification of FTC, TFV and EFV in quality control of pharmaceuticals.

Keywords

Drug, Chromatography, IPA, ICH Guidelines, TFV.

Abbrevations

AIDS: Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome; RP-HPLC: Reverse Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography; MP: Mobile Phase; ACN: Acetonitrile; ODS: Octadecylsilane; gms: Grams; FTC: Emtricitabine; EFV: Efavirenz; TFV: Tenofovir; Rt: Retion time; min: Minutes; %: Percentage; μg: Micro Grams; μm: Micro Meters; mm: Millimetres; mL: Millilitres; LOD: Limit of Detection; LOQ: Limit of Quantification; HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus; HIV-1 RT: Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type-1 Reverse Transcriptase; RNA: Ribonucleic Acid; DNA: Deoxyribonucleic Acid; d-AMP: Deoxy-Adenosine Monophosphate.

Introduction

FTC is chemically 4-amino-5-fluoro-1-[(2R,5S)-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-oxathiolan-5-yl]pyrimidin-2-one (Fig. 1). It is nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. FTC is an analogue of cytidine. It works by inhibiting the reverse transcriptase enzyme which copies the HIV RNA into viral DNA. So that it can help to lower the amount of viral load in patient’s body. It leads to increase the immune system cells [1].

Pharmaceutical-emtricitabine

Figure 1: Structure of Emtricitabine.

TFV is chemically [(2R)-1-(6-aminopurine-9-yl) propan-2-yl] oxymethylphosphonic acid (Fig. 2). It is an acyclic analogue of deoxyadenosine 5'-monophosphate (d-AMP). That lacks a hydroxyl group in the position corresponding to the 3' carbon of the d-AMP, preventing the formation of the 5′ to 3′ phoshodiester linkage, which is essential for DNA chain elongation. It causes premature termination of DNA transcription, preventing viral replication [2].

Pharmaceutical-Tenofovir

Figure 2: Structure of Tenofovir.

EFV is chemically (4S) 6 – chloro – 4 (2 – cyclopropylethynyl) – 4 – (trifluoromethyl) – 1 – H – 3,1 – benzoxazin-2 – one (Fig. 3).

Pharmaceutical-efavirenz

Figure 3: Structure of Efavirenz.

EFV is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. It directly binds to the HIV– 1 RT and RNA dependent DNA polymerase, block-ing its function to DNA replication. It leads to reduce HIV viral load, retarding damage to the immune system and reduce the risk of devel-oping AIDS.

Combination of these three drugs is to target the HIV reverse tran-scriptase protein in three ways, which reduces the virus capacity to mu-tate. In combination of three drugs synergic antiviral effects observed [3].

Methodology

Literature review reveals that analytical methods based on U.V. Spec-trophotometric methods, RP-HPLC and stability indicating studies for the determination of these 3 drugs in different combinations. So based on the review of literature we attempted a simple, precise, accurate and reproducible method [4].

Determination of solubility of drugs

Drugs were dissolved in different solvents and solubility was checked. Solubility was found good in 1% IPA, methanol and slightly solu-ble in water and acetonitrile. Hence ACN and 1% IPA in the ratio of 80:20%v/v were used as a solvent for solubility of drug.

Preparation of FTC, TFV and EFV standard solution

Weighed separately and transferred accurately 10 mg of FTC, TFV and EFV standard in to 10 ml volumetric flask. Then added about 4 ml of diluent and sonicated to dissolve completely and make up to the mark with same solvent to 10 ml (1000 μg/ml).

Preparation of FTC, TFV and EFV working standard solution Take 0.1 ml standard solution of FTC, TFV and EFV in to 10 ml vol-umetric flask. Then added about 4 ml of diluent and sonicated to dis-solve completely and make up to the mark with same solvent to 10 ml (10 μg/ml).

Preparation of 1% IPA

An accurately measured 1 ml of IPA and transferred in to 100 ml volu-metric flask, make up to the 100 ml with HPLC water.

Optimization of RP-HPLC method

The HPLC method was optimized with an aim to develop a procedure, for the method optimization different mobile phases were tried, but acceptable retention times, theoretical plates and good resolution were observed with ACN: 1% IPA (80:20%v/v), flow rate 1 ml/min by us-ing Inertial C18-ODS-3V (4.6 × 250 mm × 5 μm). Validation of the RP-HPLC method Validation of the optimized method was performed according to the ICH guidelines and optimised chromatogram was shown in Fig. 4 [5-8].

Pharmaceutical-chromatogram

Figure 4: Optimized chromatogram.

Validation of the RP-HPLC method

System suitability:

The concentration of FTC 15 μg/ml and TFV 22.5 μg/ml and EFV 45 μg/ml solutions were prepared and injected for six times into the HPLC from the area % RSD values are calculated [9].

Linearity:

From the standard stock 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25 ml and 0.075, 0.15, 0.22, 0.30, 0.375 ml and 0.15, 0.30, 0.45, 0.60, 0.75 ml of FTC, TFV and EFV solutions were pipetted out and transferred in to 10 ml volumetric flask and make up the volume with diluent. The solutions were degassed and passed through 0.45 μm membrane filter for filtration. The concentrations of the FTC 5-25 μg/ml and TFV 7.5-37.5 μg/ml and EFV 15-75 μg/ml was prepared and injected.

Precision:

From the standard stock solution 0.15 ml of FTC and 0.225 ml of TFV and 0.45 ml of EFV were pipetted out and transferred separately into six 10 ml volumetric flasks and make up to the mark with diluent. The solutions were degassed and passed through 0.45 μm membrane filter for filtration. The concentration of FTC 15 μg/ml and TFV 22.5 μg/ml and EFV 45 μg/ml solutions were injected for six times into the HPLC in the same day and three conjugative days the area for all six injections were measured and results was shown in table (Table 1).

Drug name Concentration Average
concentration
Average
%
S.D %RSD
Emtricitabine 15 14.73 98.27 0.0045 0.30
Tenofovir 22.5 23.58 104.8 0.123 0.52
Efavirenz 45 45.78 101.6 0.018 0.23

Table 1: Precision: Three conjugative days the area for all six injections.

Accuracy

Three concentrations of 50%, 100%, and 150% are prepared and injected.

Preparation of sample solution:

The average weight of tablets were determined by weighing 20 tablets and powdered. Tablet powder was equivalent to 10 mg of FTC, 15 mg of TFV and 30 mg of EFV were weighed and transferred into 10 ml volumetric flask about 4 ml of diluents was added and degassed for 15 min for the complete dissolution of the drug, volume was made up to the mark with diluent and mixed. Above solution was filtered through what’ man filter paper number 41.

Preparation of 50%, 100% and 150% solutions:

From the sample solution, pipetted out 0.15 ml and transferred into three separate 10 ml volumetric flasks; to the volumetric flasks 0.075, 0.1125 and 0.225 ml, 0.15, 0.22 and 0.45 ml, 0.225, 0.3375 and 0.675 ml of FTC, TFV and EFV standard solutions were added to get 50%, 100% and 150% solutions and make up to the mark with diluent and degassed. The solutions were filtered through 0.45 microns membrane filter and injected into the system. From the results percentage recovery was calculated and the results were shown in table (Table 2).

  Name of the drug LOD(µg/ml)   LOQ(µg/ml)
Emtricitabine 0.065 0.198
Tenofovir 0.22 0.66
Efavirenz 0.09 0.29

Table 2: Limit of detection and limit of quantification.

Limit of detection and limit of quantification

The limit of detection and the limit of quantification were calculated by using the average value of slope and the standard deviation of intercept and the results are listed in the table, results was shown in table (Table 3).

  S.
No.
  Parameters   Normal   Variation   %Recovery
Emtricitabine Tenofovir Efavirenz
1 Wavelength 256 nm 251 111.5 93.25 157.8
261 92.87 107.8 40.7
2 Temperature 30°C 25 109.5 116.7 112.9
35 109.25 116.8 112.85
3 Flow rate 1 ml/min 0.8 123.5 133.15 127.2
1.2 84.4 89.9 85.65

Table 3: Robustness studies: Variations were made to the optimized HPLC conditions.

Robustness

Deliberate variations were made to the optimized HPLC conditions, to evaluate robustness were:

Wavelength varied by ± 5 nm

Column oven temperature varied by ± 50°C

Flow rate varied by ± 0.2 ml/min

Assay

The average weight of tablets were determined by weighing 20 tablets, powdered, 1.7 gms of equivalent weight of tablet powder was weighed,transferred into 10 ml volumetric flask and about 4 ml of diluent was added, degassed for 15 minutes for the complete dissolution of drug, volume was made up to the mark with diluent and mixed. Above solution was filtered through what’s man filter paper. From the above solution 1 ml was pipetted out and transferred into 10 ml volumetric flask and made up to the mark with diluent. This solution was used for assay studies; assay calculation details mentioned in table (Tables 4 and 5).

  Name of the drug   Label claim (mg)   Amount found
(mg)
  Assay %   %RSD
Emtricitabine 10 10.18 101.83 0.76
Tenofovir 15 14.74 98.26 0.05
Efavirenz 30 30.06 100.17 0.42

Table 4: Tablet assay studies: The chromatogram of assay.

  Validation parameters   Acceptance criteria Results
Emtricitabine (FTC) Tenofovir (TFV) Efavirenz (EFV)
System suitability The % RSD of should be NMT 2.0%. 0.256 0.459 0.214
Linearity R2 should be NLT 0.999. 0.999 0.999 0.999
Intraday precision The % RSD of should be NMT 2.0%. 0.30 0.52 0.23
Intermediate precision The % RSD should be NMT 2.0%. 0.23 0.30 0.24
Accuracy The % recover should be 98.0% to 102% 100.4 100.36 100.58
LOD (µg/ml) _ 0.065 0.22 0.66
LOQ (µg/ml) _ 0.198 0.09 0.29

Table 5: Summary of Validation parameters: Acceptance criteria of FTC, TFV and EFV.

Results and Discussion

Chromatographic parameters were optimized to develop a HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of Emtricitabine, Tenofovir and Efavirenz, short analysis time (<6 min) and acceptable resolution (Rs>2) various composition of Mobile phases were tried at flow rate of 1 ml/min. Acetonitrile and 1%IPA in ratio of 80:20 showed symmetrical peaks with good resolution. The optimum Wavelength for detection was 256 nm and the RT was found to be 2.45, 2.84 and 5.21 mins respectively. Linearity curve was obtained in the concentration range of 5-25, 7.5-37.5 and 15-75 μg/ml. LOD and LOQ were 0.065, 0.22, 0.09 and 0.198, 0.66, 0.29 μg/ml determined from the slope and SD of Y-intercept of regression line of the calibration curve. The precision of the method, instrument precision were evaluated and % R.S.D values were 0.30, 0.52 and 0.23 (less than 2%). The accuracy was in the range of 100.4 to 100.6% close to 100% which complies with ICH Guidelines. Developed method was found to robust while changing the flow rate wavelength detection, temperature (Fig. 5).

Pharmaceutical-assay

Figure 5: Chromatogram of tablet assay.

Conclusion

The proposed method was developed and validated using ACN: 1% IPA in the ratio of 80: 20%v/v. IPA was used to enhance the selectivity with binary/trinity mixtures as it is a transition eluent between aqueous and non-aqueous eluents and is a co-solvent miscible with water, so it was used as a part of aqueous mobile phase.

The proposed method was simple, isocratic, sensitive, reproducible, accurate, precise and has low percentage relative standard deviation, lower linearity range, simple mobile phase i.e., without using buffers when compared with the existing methods. The analysis time for the developed method was less when compared to the existing methods so this method can be applied for the analysis of multiple samples in less time. Hence the proposed method was found to be novel, simple, accurate and robust and validation studies indicating that the proposed method was suitable for the routine analysis of the combined dosage form.

Acknowledgements

Firstly I would like to express our sincere thanks to the Management and Dr. P. Raviprakash, Professor and Principal, Dr. S V Suresh Kumar, Professor and Vice Principal, Dr. D. Madhuri, Professor and Head of the Department, Creative Educational Societies College of Pharmacy for the facilities, requirements and support during the research work.

Conflict of Interest

All the authors have read and approved the manuscript.

References

  1. Situs Slot KayaMendadak88
  2. Situs Slot Online Terbaik Dan Terpercaya No 1
  3. Slot Pragmatic Play
  4. Situs Slot Online Terpercaya
  5. Kumpulan Situs Judi Slot Terpercaya
  6. Game Slot Online
  7. Judi Slot Online Jackpot Terbesar
  8. Situs Judi Slot Online Terpercaya 2021
  9. Slot Joker123
  10. Agen Slot Online Resmi
  11. Slot Deposit Pulsa
  12. Daftar Situs Judi Slot Terbaik Dan Terpercaya No 1
  13. AloJudi Slot
  14. KayaMendadak88 Slot
  15. Situs Slot Gacor 2022
  16. Judi Slot Online Jackpot Terbesar Gampang Menang
  17. Joker123 Slot
  18. Mesin slot gacor 88
  19. Mesin slot
  20. Link Slot Online
  21. Slot Via Dana
  22. Daftar Situs Bo Slot Online Gacor Terbaik 2022
  1. Slot Online
  2. Judi Slot Online Jackpot Terbesar
  3. Daftar Situs Judi Slot Online Terpercaya
  4. Judi Slot Terpercaya
  5. Kumpulan Situs Judi QQ Online Terpercaya
  6. Slot Online Terbaru
  7. Situs Game Slot Online Terbaik
  8. Daftar Situs Judi Slot Online Gacor Gampang Menang 2022
  9. Situs Slot Deposit Pulsa dan Slot Online Terbaik
  10. Slot Hacker
  11. Situs Slot Online Terbaik
  12. Slot Gacor Gampang Menang
  13. Situs Judi Slot Online Gacor Terbaik 2022
  14. Situs Judi Slot Online Jackpot Terbesar
  15. Slot Online Terpercaya
  16. Game Slot Penghasil Uang
  17. Situs Slot Online Terbaik 2021
  18. Situs Slot Online Terbaik dan Terpercaya
  19. Situs Slot Terbaik
  20. Situs Judi Slot Terbaik Dan Terpercaya No 1